NSERC Funding opportunities

Funding opportunity

Alliance Society
Overview
Overview
Who?University researchers collaborating with private-sector, public-sector or not-for-profit organizations

College faculty can participate as co-applicants
How much?$20,000 to $500,000 per year
How long?1 to 5 years
Application deadlineNo deadline
On this page
  • Description
  • Partner organizations
  • Research topics
  • Funding your research project
  • How to apply
  • Review of your application
  • Receiving your funding and starting your project
  • During your research project
  • Results
  • Resources
  • Frequently asked questions
  • Apply now
  • Contact
Description

Alliance grants encourage university researchers to collaborate with partner organizations, which can be from the private, public or not-for-profit sectors. These grants support research projects led by strong, complementary, collaborative teams that will generate new knowledge and accelerate the application of research results to create benefits for Canada.

Alliance Society grants (formerly Alliance cost-sharing option 2) fund projects with societal impact as the main driver.

Research supported by Alliance Society grants will:

  • address a societal challenge that will result in new natural sciences and engineering knowledge and societal impact
  • bring together academic, partner organization and societal perspectives and skill sets throughout the collaboration
  • demonstrate how all interested individuals will learn about and use the products, services or policies that stem from this research
  • generate new knowledge and/or technology to address complex challenges
  • create economic, social and/or environmental benefits
  • contribute to Canada’s long-term competitiveness
  • support public policy
  • train new researchers in areas that are important to Canada and the partner organizations
  • draw on diverse perspectives and skill sets to accelerate the translation and application of research results
Who can apply?

If you are a Canadian university researcher who is eligible to receive NSERC funds, you can apply on your own or as a team with co-applicants who are also eligible academic researchers. Adjunct professors working outside the Canadian university sector (e.g., government, industry or colleges) may apply as co-applicants. You must have at least one partner organization (in the private, public or not-for-profit sector) that could be recognized for cost sharing (see Alliance Society: Partner organizations), but you may include other partner organizations who play an important role in your research project, whether or not they could be recognized for cost sharing.

Alliance grants support projects of varying scale and complexity, from short-term smaller projects involving one researcher to long-term projects involving researchers across several universities, and from one-on-one collaborations with one partner organization directly involved in the research to projects involving many partner organizations across multiple sectors.

Equity, diversity and inclusion

NSERC is acting on the evidence that achieving a more equitable, diverse and inclusive Canadian research enterprise is essential to creating the excellent, innovative and impactful research necessary to advance knowledge and understanding, and to respond to local, national and global challenges. This principle informs the commitments described in the Tri-agency Statement on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) and is aligned with the objectives of the Tri-agency EDI Action Plan.

Excellent research considers EDI both in the research environment (forming a research team, student training) and in the research process. For Alliance grants, EDI considerations are currently evaluated in the training, mentorship and professional development opportunities for students and trainees. The aim is to remove barriers to the recruitment and promote the full participation of individuals from underrepresented groups, including women, Indigenous Peoples (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis), persons with disabilities, members of visible minority/racialized groups and members of 2SLGBTQI+ communities. Applicants are encouraged to increase the inclusion and advancement of underrepresented groups as one way to enhance the excellence in research and training. For additional guidance, applicants should refer to Alliance grants: Equity, diversity and inclusion in your training plan and the NSERC guide on integrating equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in research.

Research security

To ensure that the Canadian research ecosystem is as open as possible and as safeguarded as necessary, the Government of Canada has introduced the Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern (STRAC Policy) and the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships (NSGRP).

For more information about research security at the granting agencies, refer to the Tri-agency guidance on research security.

Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern

The STRAC Policy addresses risks related to Sensitive Technology Research Areas performed with research organizations and institutions that pose the highest risk to Canada’s national security. The STRAC Policy applies to this funding opportunity.

Applicants must identify whether the grant application aims to advance a Sensitive Technology Research Area. If so, the submission of attestation forms will be required from researchers with named roles (for this funding opportunity, these are the applicants, co-applicants, and collaborators) to certify that they are not currently affiliated with, nor are in receipt of funding or in-kind support from, a Named Research Organization (NRO).

The Tri-agency guidance on the STRAC Policy provides more information on applicable procedures and requirements, including responsibilities of researchers and the responsibilities of institutions.

National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships

The National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships integrate national security considerations into the development, evaluation and funding of research partnerships. These guidelines provide a framework through which researchers, research institutions and Canada’s granting agencies can undertake consistent, risk-targeted due diligence to identify and mitigate potential national security risks linked to research partnerships.

The National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships apply to Alliance grant applications involving one or more partner organizations from the private sector, including when they participate alongside other partner organizations from the public and/or not-for-profit sectors. For such partnerships, you and your post-secondary institution are required to complete a Risk Assessment form for your research project and submit it as an integral part of your Alliance application.

If your Risk Assessment form identifies risks related to data that will be mitigated — in part or in whole — by your data management plan (DMP), the risk mitigation plan section of your Risk Assessment form must also describe how your DMP will address those data-related risks.

The Tri-agency guidance on the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships provides more information on applicable procedures and requirements.

Data management plan

Alliance Society is now part of a pilot initiative where applicants are being asked to submit a data management plan (DMP) with their application. The results of this pilot will be used to inform NSERC’s implementation of the Tri-agency Research Data Management Policy’s DMP requirement. The DMP is not part of the scoring or the formal evaluation of the application; however, during this pilot, PIVP committee members are asked to provide feedback on submitted DMPs to help support applicants.

DMPs contribute to research efficiency by encouraging researchers to proactively establish how they will manage their data through all stages of the research activities. DMPs should describe what data are expected to be collected, created, linked to, acquired or recorded; how data will be documented, formatted, protected, and stored; who will be responsible for managing the data; whether and how data and research results will be shared within and outside of the funded team/project; and any ethical, legal and commercial constraints the data are subject to (if applicable).

For more information on research data management and DMPs, see the Tri-agency Research Data Management Policy – Frequently Asked Questions, SSHRC’s Guide to Preparing a DMP and the Training Resources page of the Digital Research Alliance of Canada. Researchers are also encouraged to familiarize themselves with the DMP resources available at their institutions, such as their institution’s research data management strategy.

Refer to How to apply and the instructions for completing an Alliance grant application for further information.

Partner organizations

Your partner organizations can be private, public or not-for-profit. You may involve whichever partner organizations you need to achieve your research goals and successfully mobilize your research results to achieve the desired impact. At least one of these partners must have a demonstrated ability to exploit such research results, while other partners may be chosen for their ability to generate and mobilize knowledge. Each partner organization must actively play a role in the project and support it through in-kind contributions. Such involvement must be achieved by doing at least one of the following:

  • Playing an active role in the project’s research activities
  • Using the project’s research results to help achieve its desired outcomes
  • Playing an active role in translating or mobilizing knowledge to ensure that the research results have an impact

Active participation in the project and in-kind contributions are not required from funding organizations (e.g., other provincial or federal funding agencies) providing financial support to the project.

Role of partner organizations

In an R&D project considered for an Alliance Society grant, at least one partner organization must be recognized for cost sharing, but a cash contribution is not required. To be recognized for cost sharing, a partner organization must:

  • be listed as a type of organization whose cash contributions can be recognized for cost sharing with NSERC, in section 1 below
  • meet the detailed requirements that apply to the partner organization’s sector (private, Canadian public or Canadian not-for-profit), in section 2 below

If your project is receiving funding from other government agencies, these agencies should be included as partners in the application to show the full scope of the project and its financial support. Funders are not required to participate in the project or provide in-kind contributions, although they may.

In reviewing your application for an Alliance Society grant, NSERC will assess the relevance and potential impact of each partner organization and its proposed in-kind contributions. NSERC will prioritize funding to projects that most clearly fulfill the objectives of Alliance Society grants.

All partner organizations, including foreign and multinational companies, are responsible for complying with NSERC policies and procedures, and with other Canadian laws, regulations, standards or policies that apply to the collaborative research activities outlined in the proposal. In rare cases, restrictions such as Canadian economic sanctions may apply to partnerships with foreign companies.

The applicant will ask partners to participate in the application by completing a partner organization form (see the instructions). In addition, at NSERC’s request, a partner organization must provide supplemental information that describes the organization and enables NSERC to determine whether the partner organization can be recognized for cost sharing.

Number of participating organizations

If you are applying for an Alliance Society grant, you can include just one partner organization or several—whichever you need to support the planned activities (given their size and scope) and produce the desired research results and widest possible benefits. Your application must demonstrate that the contributions and involvement of the partner organization or organizations will create the necessary conditions for the project’s success.

Partner organizations recognized for cost sharing

To determine which of your proposed partner organizations can be recognized for cost sharing, follow the three steps below. Alternatively, you may complete the partner organization self-assessment tool.

  1. Check where each partner organization is listed in the following table.
Types of partner organizations whose cash contributions can and cannot be recognized in NSERC cost-sharing calculations
Private sector

 

Cash contributions can be recognized

 

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Canadian private companies (registered or incorporated)
  • Multinationals with business operations in Canada (see detailed requirements below)
  • Foreign companies (only if they are partnering with a Canadian partner organization that is recognized in NSERC’s cost-sharing calculations)
  • Venture capital/angel investors
  • Holding companies
  • Companies with fewer than two full-time employees
Canadian public sector

 

Cash contributions can be recognized

 

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Municipalities and local or regional governments established by or under provincial or territorial statute
  • Provincial/territorial government departments
  • Federal government departments
  • Indigenous organizations
  • Public utilities
  • Crown corporations
  • Funding organizations (federal, provincial, territorial, international) whose primary mission is to fund R&D
  • Organizations whose primary mission is to perform R&D
  • Foreign governments
Canadian not-for-profit

 

Cash contributions can be recognized

 

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Producer groups (typically representing agriculture, aquaculture or viniculture producers)
  • Industrial associations
  • Registered charities
  • Organizations whose primary mission is to maintain collections (e.g., historical, scientific, artistic or cultural) for the public good, such as libraries, museums, zoos or aquariums
  • Community organizations
  • Indigenous not-for-profit organizations and communities
  • Unions
  • Not-for-profit organizations whose primary mission is to fund R&D and are funded or controlled primarily by government
  • Post-secondary institutions
  • Incubators and accelerators
  • Hospitals and medical/clinical research institutes
  • Consortia with the majority of their funding originating from government sources
  • Foreign not-for-profit organizations
  • Individuals

Types of partner organizations whose cash contributions can and cannot be recognized in NSERC cost-sharing calculations

Private sector

Cash contributions can be recognized

  • Canadian private companies (registered or incorporated)
  • Multinationals with business operations in Canada
  • Foreign companies (only if they are partnering with a Canadian partner organization that is recognized in NSERC’s cost-sharing calculations)

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Venture capital/angel investors
  • Holding companies
  • Companies with fewer than two full-time employees

Canadian public sector

Cash contributions can be recognized

  • Municipalities and local or regional governments established by or under provincial or territorial statute
  • Provincial/territorial government departments
  • Federal government departments
  • Indigenous organizations
  • Public utilities
  • Crown corporations

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Funding organizations (federal, provincial, territorial, international) whose primary mission is to fund R&D
  • Organizations whose primary mission is to perform R&D
  • Foreign governments

Canadian not-for-profit

Cash contributions can be recognized

  • Producer groups (typically representing agriculture, aquaculture or viniculture producers)
  • Industrial associations
  • Registered charities
  • Organizations whose primary mission is to maintain collections (e.g., historical, scientific, artistic or cultural) for the public good, such as libraries, museums, zoos or aquariums
  • Community organizations
  • Indigenous not-for-profit organizations and communities
  • Unions

Cash contributions cannot be recognized

  • Not-for-profit organizations whose primary mission is to fund R&D and are funded or controlled primarily by government
  • Post-secondary institutions
  • Incubators and accelerators
  • Hospitals and medical/clinical research institutes
  • Consortia with the majority of their funding originating from government sources
  • Foreign not-for-profit organizations
  • Individuals
     
  1. If the partner organization’s type is listed above as being recognized for cost-sharing, then determine whether it meets the following detailed requirements.

Requirements for partner organizations recognized for cost sharing

(includes Canadian public or private for-profit companies)

Partner organizations must:

  • be federally or provincially/territorially registered or incorporated
  • have at least two full-time employees

    All companies with fewer than five full-time employees must complete the Partner organization supplemental information questionnaire and attach it to the NSERC application.

  • have staff with relevant expertise to collaborate actively in the project
  • carry out R&D and/or produce goods or provide services in Canada
  • operate from its own offices or facilities

    All companies operating from a home address or a virtual work setting must complete the Partner organization supplemental information questionnaire (attach it to the NSERC application).

  • have the financial, managerial and technical capacity to exploit the results of the proposed research within Canada
  • generate revenue from sales or derive the majority of its revenues from private-sector investment (i.e., government aid does not represent the majority of its revenues)
  • operate independently (e.g., have a board of directors or similar oversight)

The following two situations will be considered for NSERC cost sharing:

  1. The multinational company has business operations in Canada, and it plans to make its in-kind contributions toward your research project from any of its Canadian locations. In this case, the company’s Canadian-based operations must meet the partner organization requirements outlined in the Canadian private sector category.
  2. The multinational company is either headquartered in Canada or operates a Canadian subsidiary that meets both of the following conditions: it has more than 100 employees, and it either produces goods/services in Canada or conducts R&D in Canada. (Note: the provision of sales and/or after-sales services of goods produced outside of Canada does not meet the definition of producing services in Canada.)

    In this case, the company must have the financial, managerial and technical capacity to exploit the results of the proposed research within its Canadian subsidiary. The company has the option to make some or all of its in-kind contributions to your Canadian research project from any of its locations outside Canada. The following requirements must be met and the benefits to Canada and Canadians must be clearly demonstrated.

    The location(s) outside Canada that is/are chosen to contribute to the collaboration must:
    • have R&D facilities and capabilities suitable for the project
    • have the research and financial capacity to collaborate in the project
    • carry out business activities that are aligned with the research objectives

(defined as a company incorporated outside of Canada that does not carry out R&D or produce/manufacture goods or services in Canada)

Must:

  • participate with at least one Canadian partner organization that is recognized in NSERC’s cost-sharing calculation and meets all of NSERC’s partner organization requirements
  • demonstrate that it has the research and financial capacity to collaborate in the project
  • clearly outline in the proposal the benefits to Canada and Canadians of including the foreign company in the research project

Crown corporations (including other public organizations owned by Crown corporations)

Indigenous organizations

Municipalities, local or regional governments established by or under provincial or territorial statute

Provincial/territorial or federal government departments

Must have staff who will play an active role in the project’s research activities and either:

  • have a mandate to create or modify policy or regulation that is relevant to the proposed project and the capacity to use the research results, or
  • have the capacity to exploit the research results directly for economic gain

(typically representing agriculture, aquaculture or viniculture producers)

Must:

  • be legally established as an organization under applicable federal, provincial or territorial statutes
  • have a mandate to coordinate and fund research on behalf of their members in areas of importance for the commodities the organization represents and/or to mobilize knowledge to encourage the growth and sustainability of the industry
  • demonstrate in the proposal that staff or committees with relevant expertise to collaborate in the project will be involved throughout the project, either through one of the organization’s boards or committees or through one or more of the organization’s members
  • clearly outline in the proposal the roles and contributions of the organization’s members who intend to participate in the project, if applicable
  • disseminate information to all members; translate and mobilize knowledge from the project to members and indicate how its impact will be measured
  • clearly outline in-kind contributions through project design, project oversight, meetings, or through participation of staff, board or committee members or member producers
  • clearly outline training of highly qualified personnel through the producer group or its members

Must:

  • be legally established as an organization under applicable federal, provincial or territorial statutes
  • have the mandate to coordinate and fund research in areas of importance for the group or sector the organization represents
  • demonstrate in the proposal that staff with relevant expertise to collaborate in the project will be involved, either directly or through one or more of the organization’s members
  • clearly outline in the proposal the roles and contributions of the organization’s members who intend to participate in the project
  • clearly outline in the proposal a credible plan to exploit the research results and demonstrate the availability of resources to implement the results, either directly or through one or more of the organization’s members
  • clearly outline in-kind contributions, typically by the association members with project management by the association
  • clearly outline training of highly qualified personnel, typically through the involvement of a member company or member companies

Must:

  • be registered with the Canada Revenue Agency and appear on its List of charities and certain other qualified donees
  • employ staff with relevant expertise to collaborate in the project

(e.g., historical, scientific, artistic or cultural) for the public good such as libraries, museums, zoos or aquariums

Must:

  • employ staff with relevant expertise to collaborate in the project

Must:

  • have the ability to contribute to guiding the research

Must:

  • have the ability to contribute to guiding the research

Must:

  • employ staff with relevant expertise to collaborate in the project
  • have a credible plan to exploit the research results, and the necessary resources to implement the results
National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships

In the case where your NSERC Alliance application involves one or more partner organization from the private sector, including when they participate alongside other partner organizations from the public and/or not-for-profit sectors, you must complete the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form and submit it as an integral part of the application.

The requirement to submit the completed Risk Assessment form applies to industrial associations since their member organizations are principally from the private sector. When filling out the form, you must consider the association’s private-sector member organizations participating in the project (when applicable) and/or those that will exploit the research results.

Conflict of interest guidelines for partner organizations

These guidelines changed as of December 5, 2023, to provide flexible access to NSERC Alliance grants while ensuring that funds are used responsibly and all research participants are protected.

NSERC requires applicants, co-applicants and other participants in Alliance grants to report any conflict of interest to their institution before applying for a grant and as a condition of accepting an award. Institutions must assess conflicts of interest and implement mitigation plans to comply with conflict of interest requirements in the Agreement on the Administration of Agency Grants and Awards by Research Institutions. All participants must also adhere to the Tri-agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research (2021). Under the agreement and framework, conflict of interest encompasses not only real but also perceived or potential conflicts of interest.

NSERC encourages participants to discuss conflicts of interest at the earliest stages of developing a partnership. Transparency in disclosing affiliations, relationships and sources of funding is also important to ensure that research is conducted in line with best practices for research integrity and research security. The best means to minimize potential impacts of conflicts of interest is to declare such conflicts and develop and implement a mitigation plan.

What is a conflict of interest?

The guiding principles below refer to this broader definition of “conflict of interest:”

When activities or situations place an individual or institution in a conflict between the duties or responsibilities related to research and personal, institutional or other interests, this is considered a conflict of interest. Such interests include national or international business, commercial, financial or other interests of the institution, the individual, their family members, friends, or their former, current or prospective professional associates. Divided loyalties may consciously or unconsciously bias researchers and institutions, adversely affecting research outcomes and the welfare of participants.

Guiding principles
  • As researchers or institutions, you must assess conflicts of interest when conducting research, as such conflicts may jeopardize the integrity of the research and the protection of participants.
  • As a researcher, you must transparently disclose any conflict of interest to your institution and all participants in the proposed research activities, including trainees. When necessary, you must take steps to minimize and manage these conflicts according to your institution’s conflict of interest policy and disciplinary standards. All participants should always strive to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • As a researcher, you must make prospective participants aware of all conflicts of interest at the earliest stage so that they can make an informed decision about their participation.
  • As researchers, institutions and research ethics boards, you should identify and address conflicts of interest to discharge professional and institutional obligations, maintain public confidence and trust, and ensure accountability.

For more information, refer to the:

  • Terms and conditions of applying for applicants
  • Terms and conditions of applying for partner organizations
Research topics

You can apply to support any R&D project that seeks to respond to a research challenge in the natural sciences or engineering (see Selecting the appropriate federal granting agency). However, you cannot use an Alliance grant to support secret or contract research.

Collaborating outside the natural sciences and engineering

Developing and implementing policies or directly applying your research results may depend on socio-economic or other requirements, as well as scientific understanding beyond the natural sciences and engineering (NSE). You are encouraged to collaborate with academic researchers in fields other than the NSE. Such researchers may be co-applicants for Alliance grants if they meet NSERC’s eligibility criteria for faculty. Research costs for these collaborations and/or activities outside the NSE can represent up to 30% of the project costs (see Funding your research project) and must be specifically identified in the project budget justification.

Collaborating internationally

To increase the impact of Canadian NSE research in the global research community, you may incorporate international collaborations into your project proposal. You may interact with foreign colleagues in a variety of ways to enhance collaboration and increase your project’s impact. Refer to the Tri-agency Guide on Financial Administration regarding the eligibility of expenses you may incur in support of such collaborations.

Alliance Society: projects with societal impact as the main driver

To be eligible for an Alliance Society grant:

  • projects must involve research at the intersection of science/engineering and society, with societal impact as the main driver
  • teams must involve the people affected by these issues—who will benefit from the research results—in identifying the challenge and designing a strategy to solve the challenge
  • teams must share the results in ways that the affected groups will use, and a collaborative approach is expected

Your project may solve a challenge or take a first step toward achieving your ultimate societal goals. Because this approach is more challenging and requires more effort, NSERC covers 100% of the project costs. NSERC’s contribution will allow you to make crucial advances toward these longer-term benefits.

Your partnership must include:

  • at least one partner organization that would be recognized for cost sharing under Alliance grants and that will make in-kind contributions to the project
  • societal groups affected by the challenge that can benefit from and use the results of the project

Projects must meet the following three criteria. A selection committee will examine whether applications meet the criteria. Only applications that do so will continue to peer review, and applications that fail to meet these criteria will be rejected.

Societal impact
  • Identify a need affecting Canadian end users and society
  • Develop an approach involving science and engineering research to meet the need
  • Aim for benefits that reach societal end users and go beyond the direct interests of participating partner organizations

Your project must result in new technical knowledge that can be adopted by end users to make a positive impact on society in Canada.

Your objectives and research strategy must be well aligned with the needs of the affected societal groups. You can realize benefits in collaboration with any sector—private, public or not-for-profit.

Making connections
  • Identify partner organizations and societal groups affected by—or interested in—the problem, including those outside natural sciences and engineering, when appropriate
  • Engage these partner organizations and societal groups to bring their knowledge to the research design and implementation
  • Involve these partner organizations and groups in integrating the solutions within and across sectors

The approach should bring together academic and societal groups, and partner organizations throughout the collaboration—from design, through execution to implementation. Impacts are stronger when the project makes connections within and outside the natural sciences and engineering. Non-academic partners and groups have a unique understanding of the challenge. Although they cannot resolve it on their own, they can define the need and participate in knowledge exchange to implement the results. Your partner organizations can advance the project through a high level of participation and sharing results beyond their own organizations. Your application must explain how the partner organizations’ involvement will lead to adoption.

Broad outputs
  • Have a clear plan to communicate progress and the resulting products, services or policies beyond the academic world
  • Use non-technical and innovative formats that partner organizations and societal groups can understand and that help exchange knowledge with these organizations and groups
  • Demonstrate how the management of the project-generated intellectual property (IP) allows organizations and groups affected by the societal challenge to use the results without any obstacles

Your project must aim for outcomes that are more than improvements to a product or a service for increased profit. Your project may advance a sector and its practices, or it may provide evidence that leads to new policies or regulations. The results should be shared in various ways, including technical formats, such as publications, and non-technical formats that end users can find, understand and use. Your proposal must explain how all interested individuals and groups, beyond partner organizations, will learn about and use the results of your research. You must describe how your IP plan will allow the individuals and groups affected by the societal challenge to access the outcomes.

Funded projects

The following projects that were approved for funding demonstrate these criteria and may serve as examples when developing your project.

  • Societal impact: To ensure safe water supply by providing accurate and relevant data for decision-making, given that Canada’s freshwater monitoring network is currently fragmented and lacks communication and coordination.
  • Making connections: A federal department, a provincial water security agency, local community groups and a Canadian not-for-profit social enterprise.
  • Broad outputs: Development of an open data hub and partner outreach platforms connecting over 110,000 people, 130 societal groups and 1,800 online users, as well as training for 5,500 students. Interactive education tools, online training on water stewardship and intensive dissemination through networks of government, non-government organizations and community groups for sustainable and meaningful community-based water monitoring. Results will improve data for academic research and government and help make water testing programs sustainable across Canada.
  • Societal impact: To help the building sector reduce greenhouse gases and implement green building initiatives and eco-design by improving life-cycle analysis in the construction industry.
  • Making connections: Expertise and data is shared between a not-for-profit housing organization, a team of academics and relevant contacts in the construction industry.
  • Broad outputs: A simplified life-cycle analysis for the construction industry will be disseminated to the whole industry and public stakeholders (architects, engineers, public administration, etc.) via workshops, conferences, public symposia and the partner’s large network, to help the industry adopt green construction and guide new standards and programs for the sector.
  • Societal impact: To understand the impact of fisheries practices and environmental changes in marine ecosystems of economic and cultural significance to Indigenous communities and rights holders.
  • Making connections: Indigenous communities and a conservation group will share their perspectives on these ecosystems with commercial fisheries that exploit them, and a federal government department will develop a framework for safeguarding the interests of all.
  • Broad outputs: Participation of all parties in defining the issue and the path to resolving it satisfactorily for all, and policy development by the federal government department.
Funding your research project

You and your co-applicants may receive funds from multiple sources to cover the costs of your research project.

These sources of funds could include:

  • Alliance grant funding from NSERC to cover the direct costs of the research
  • Cash provided by the partner organization(s), the university or external sources, such as other funding agencies

The funds from NSERC must be paid to eligible universities and cannot be used to buy equipment, products or services from any partner organization, or to cover any part of the travel and travel-related subsistence expenditures for partner organization personnel. For Alliance Society, expenses that are direct costs of research and essential for the success of the project incurred by partners that are Indigenous organizations in the public or not-for-profit sectors may be included in the application budget. Please consult with NSERC before submitting your application.

NSERC funds can only be applied to expenses incurred after an award is approved.

Alliance Society

Alliance  Society Limit on number of applications per year: none
Value: $20,000 to $500,000 per year
Duration: one to five years

Size of partner organization
All partner sizes

Type of partnership
Partners from any sector. Your partners must include at least one partner that could be recognized for cost sharing, although a cash contribution is not required

NSERC contribution to project costs
100%

You and your co-applicants may receive funds from other sources to cover the direct costs of your project. These sources of funds could include cash contributions provided by the university or other funding agencies. Such funds would add to and complement those requested from NSERC. You must include all of the project's direct costs funded by sources other than NSERC in the budget table. All costs must be explained in the proposal and will be considered in the merit assessment of your proposal.

In-kind contributions are important for the success of the project. All partner organizations participating in the project must play an active role in it and make in-kind contributions through such involvement. In-kind contributions are considered in the merit assessment of your proposal (see Evaluation criteria).

Eligible expenses

You can include only NSERC-eligible direct costs of research in your project budget, such as:

  • Salary support for research trainees (undergraduates, graduates and postdoctoral fellows) to perform research and related training
  • Salary support for technicians and research professional personnel
  • Materials and supplies
  • Activities that support collaborations and knowledge mobilization related to the project
  • Activities to develop and grow the research collaborations with the partner organizations

Refer to the guidelines on the use of grant funds in the Tri-agency Guide on Financial Administration.

You can also include the costs of equipment, provided that the equipment is:

  • essential to achieving the objectives of the research project
  • incremental to the equipment already available at the university or at the partner organization’s location

If your total expected equipment cost (including operation and maintenance) exceeds $400,000 over your project’s duration, then you should apply for an alternate source of funding, such as the Canada Foundation for Innovation’s (CFI) John R. Evans Leaders Fund. NSERC and CFI have developed a joint application and review procedure for these cases. You may contact NSERC or CFI for more details.

Project management costs may be an eligible expense, up to 10% of the total direct research costs (see Guidelines for research partnerships programs project management expenses). The need for project management expenses must be explained in the budget justification section.

Extension of grants

Following the initial period of your grant, NSERC will automatically extend your grant for one year to allow you to complete your planned activities. No additional funding is provided for this automatic one-year extension.

If you need additional extensions due to justifiable extenuating circumstances, you can apply for these using a grant amendment form. Such extensions are up to one year at a time and do not include additional funding.

How to apply

You can apply at any time. Follow the instructions for completing an Alliance grant application, fill out the proposal template and complete the other sections of your application. Note that Alliance grants allow 20% more space for French content in application sections that have a page or character limit.

If your application involves one or more partner organizations from the private sector, including when they participate alongside other partner organizations from the public and/or not-for-profit sectors, also complete the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form.

Following the Tri-agency guidance on the Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern (STRAC Policy), if your application aims to advance a listed sensitive technology research area, the applicant, co-applicant(s) and collaborator(s) must each complete the STRAC Attestation form.

Before submitting your application, use the Alliance grant application checklist to ensure it is complete.

Submit your completed application and supporting documents, including the Personal data form with CCV attachment for the applicant and all co-applicants, through NSERC’s online system. Your partner organization’s contact person will be invited through the online system to provide information about the organization following the partner organization instructions.

Merit evaluation criteria

The merit of your application is evaluated using the following four equally weighted criteria. The proposal must address all criteria and sub-criteria to be considered for funding.

1. Partnership

1.1 Partner organizations’ roles in the project and value of their involvement and any other in-kind contributions

1.2 Relevance of the partnership and capacity of the partner organizations to translate, mobilize and/or apply the research results

2. Research plan and team

2.1 Clarity of the research objectives and expected results, appropriateness of the research plan, and suitability of the budget

2.2 Appropriateness of the expertise of the team (academic and partner organization participants) for carrying out the planned research activities, as well as for managing the project and providing training

3. Training

3.1. Opportunities for enriched learning experiences for research trainees (undergraduate and graduate students, postdoctoral fellows) to develop relevant research skills, as well as professional skills (e.g., leadership, communication, collaboration and entrepreneurship)

3.2 Consideration of equity, diversity and inclusion in the training plan

4. Research impact and benefits to Canada

4.1 Innovativeness of the proposed research and its potential to lead to advancements or new knowledge in the natural sciences or engineering disciplines

4.2 Significance of the outcomes and the economic, environmental and/or other societal benefits for Canada and Canadians

NSERC uses established merit indicators to rate each evaluation criterion/sub-criterion.

Review of your application

When NSERC receives an Alliance application, it first undertakes an administrative assessment to ensure the application is complete and complies with all requirements. Once the administrative assessment is satisfactorily completed, NSERC proceeds with the merit assessment of the application, using a variety of tools and taking into account the average annual amount of funding requested.

Merit assessment mechanismsApproximate thresholds

Small project
Annual request of at least $20,000 up to an average annual request of $75,000 for 1 to 5 years

Medium project
Average annual request of more than $75,000 up to $300,000 for 1 to 5 years

Large project
Average annual request of more than $300,000 up to a maximum annual request of $500,000 for 1 to 5 years

Assessment mechanism

For Alliance Society grants, the assessment includes three steps.

First, your full application will be submitted to a multidisciplinary and multisectoral selection committee (the Public Impact Value Proposition [PIVP]  Selection Committee) that will assess whether it justifies a higher NSERC contribution (see Alliance Society: Research topics).

If the committee determines that your application fits the objectives of Alliance Society, it proceeds to the second step for the assessment of its ove   rall merit. External reviewers with expertise directly related to the proposal will provide reviews based on the merit evaluation criteria.

If your application is deemed meritorious, it will returned to the PIVP Selection Committee to be ranked for funding on a competitive basis.

For reviewers and selection committees

If you are a reviewer for Alliance grant applications, you will use the following instructions to complete your review:

  • Instructions to external reviewers
  • Alliance Society public impact value proposition (PIVP) selection committee review instructions
Risk assessment

In the case where your proposal involves one or more partner organizations from the private sector, including when they participate alongside other partner organizations from the public and/or not-for-profit sectors, NSERC will review the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form that you provided with your application (including the risk mitigation plan, when applicable) following the risk assessment review process. Following this process, when additional expertise is required, NSERC will seek further national security assessment and advice from Canada’s national security departments and agencies.

Funding decision

NSERC’s funding decision will take into consideration the merit and public impact evaluations as well as the assessment of potential risks for Canada’s national security, when applicable.

NSERC will use the merit indicator ratings assigned to applications, and recommendation from the PIVP Selection Committee, to select proposals for funding on a competitive basis. Where applicable, NSERC will also consider the results of the risk assessment review process to ensure that any identified risks are appropriately mitigated. Following the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships, applications where risks cannot be appropriately mitigated will not be funded.

The expected assessment time for Alliance Society grants is 20-30 weeks. If NSERC requires further national security assessment and advice from Canada’s national security departments and agencies to inform the funding decision, this additional assessment will extend the expected assessment time by up to 10 weeks.

NSERC is committed to achieving these service standards for 80% of applications, recognizing that some proposals may require additional time.

Receiving your funding and starting your projectAward letter, terms and conditions

If your application is approved for funding, you will receive an award letter, and you must adhere to the terms and conditions set out in it.

Transfer of funds and start date

Your award letter will indicate the start date of your project. NSERC will normally transfer your grant funds to your university within 30 days of that start date.

Indigenous public and not-for-profit sector partner expenses

Should expenses be approved for a Indigenous public or not-for-profit sector partner, please note that as per the Tri-agency Guide on Financial Administration, NSERC only permits the transfer of grant funds to NSERC-eligible institutions. Eligible expenses of the Indigenous partners must therefore be paid via invoices, contracts or accountable advances. These are not considered to be grant transfers. Should an award be offered, the host university research services office and/or business office/finance group and partners should determine the best/preferred approach on payment method.

Research agreements and intellectual property

NSERC recommends that you and your university follow best practices by signing a research agreement that defines the intellectual property rights and obligations of all the partner organizations involved in your research project. The agreement must be aligned with NSERC’s Policy on Intellectual Property, which promotes the use and/or exploitation of knowledge and open access to results of research funded by NSERC.

Notes:

  • NSERC claims no rights of ownership to any intellectual property generated by Alliance grant projects
  • NSERC’s Policy on Intellectual Property stipulates that each of your students must maintain their right to defend their thesis without delays or impediments
  • All participants, including any trainees, should consult this policy to ensure that they are aware of their rights and obligations
During your research projectAcknowledging NSERC

You must acknowledge NSERC support in any communications or presentations about the research supported by your Alliance grant.

Reporting progress

You must report regularly on how you use the funds from your grant, the activities you carry out during your funded project and the outcomes of this project. You will be informed of reporting requirements upon receiving your award letter.

Notifying NSERC about changes

Subsequent instalments of your grant depend on (1) a demonstrated need for NSERC funds and (2) adherence to all other conditions specified in the terms and conditions of an award.

You must notify NSERC:

  • if any of your partner organizations leave the project—in this case
    • you should discuss with NSERC the impact on your ability to achieve the original goals of the project and whether the project may need to be amended
    • if you no longer have at least one partner organization that is recognized for cost-sharing, you have up to six months to find an alternate partner organization
    • if you cannot find such an organization, you must notify NSERC and submit a wind-down plan that focuses on student support

If you and your partner organizations fail to provide the requested feedback, your subsequent applications may be denied. If a partner organization fails to honour its commitments, NSERC may also decline to consider it in future applications.

Extension of grants

Following the initial period of your grant, NSERC will automatically extend your grant for one year to allow you to complete your planned activities. No additional funding is provided for this automatic one-year extension.

If you need additional extensions due to justifiable extenuating circumstances, you can apply for these using a grant amendment form. Such extensions are up to one year at a time and do not include additional funding.

Results

Alliance grants encourage university researchers to collaborate with partner organizations, which can be from the private, public or not-for-profit sectors. These grants support research projects led by strong, complementary, collaborative teams that will generate new knowledge and accelerate the application of research results to create benefits for Canada. The resources below provide more information on the grants awarded and additional metrics:

  • Alliance funding decisions: a list of new Alliance grants awarded per competition year (updated on a quarterly basis)
  • Alliance dashboard: a further breakdown of where Alliance invests its funding, partner types, area of application and more
ResourcesPartners
  • Partner organization self-assessment tool
  • Partner organization form instructions
  • Partner organization supplemental information questionnaire
ApplyApplication instructions and materials
  • Completing an application — form 101 instructions (including page lengths)
  • Proposal template (effective December 5, 2023)
  • National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ risk assessment form
  • Personal data form with CCV attachment — form 100A instructions
  • Canadian Common CV — How to complete NSERC’s version
  • Alliance grant application checklist
Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI)
  • Alliance grants: Equity, diversity and inclusion in your training plan
  • Tri-agency statement on equity, diversity and inclusion
  • Tri-agency EDI action plan
Supplementary guides and overviews
  • Alliance Society overview pamphlet
  • Safeguarding your research portal
Terms and conditions of applying
  • Terms and conditions of applying for applicants
  • Terms and conditions of applying for partner organizations
Review
  • Alliance Society Merit indicators (effective December 5, 2023)
  • Instructions for external reviewers (effective December 5, 2023)
  • Alliance Society public impact value proposition (PIVP) selection committee review instructions
Award
  • Terms and conditions of award
  • Policy on intellectual property
Additional links
  • Eligibility
  • Tri-agency guide on financial administration
  • Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research (2021)
  • Professors frequently asked questions
  • Appeals of NSERC funding decisions
Frequently asked questionsGeneral

No. Only Canadian university researchers who are eligible to receive NSERC funds can apply for an Alliance grant. However, college faculty members can participate as co-applicants in Alliance grant applications, provided they meet NSERC’s eligibility criteria.

College-based applicants can continue to apply to the existing suite of college grants under the College and Community Innovation program.

NSERC does not claim any ownership of IP or stipulate who must own any IP resulting from the research partnership. However, the ownership and protection of IP generated by research supported through an Alliance grant must follow the principles described in NSERC’s Policy on Intellectual Property. For any Alliance grant, NSERC recommends that you and your institution follow the best practice of signing a research agreement with the partner organization(s).

Application

The Alliance Advantage or Alliance Society web pages provide information on how to apply through NSERC’s online system. Before preparing your application, you are encouraged to read the program description and the instructions for completing an application. You should also consult related resources such as the application checklist and Safeguarding Your Research portal.

If you have questions regarding the program or the application process, you may also contact NSERC’s Alliance staff.

The application length depends on the average annual request from NSERC, the official language it contains, and whether the applicant and all co-applicants hold an active NSERC peer-reviewed grant (except for early career researcher (ECR) co-applicants). The application instructions include a table presenting the suggested section lengths for your proposal and the overall page limit. The text in the proposal template counts toward the overall page limit.

No. The font type and size requirements do not apply to text inside tables and figures. Still, for text inside tables and figures, you must use a font type and size that is clearly legible. NSERC reserves the right not to accept your application if it does not meet this requirement. Note that figures and tables count toward the specified page limits.

In the case where your research partnership involves one or more partner organizations from the private sector, including when they participate alongside other partner organizations from the public and/or not-for-profit sectors or participate as members of industrial associations or producer groups, you must complete the risk assessment questionnaire of the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form. If you identify potential risks when filling out the questionnaire, you must also complete the risk mitigation plan section of the form. When partner organizations from the private sector are involved in your application, the completed National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form is an integral part of your application.

No. If your Alliance project involves one or more partner organizations from the private sector, you must complete the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships’ Risk Assessment form, regardless of organization type.

Yes. In such a case, you must only assess the risks associated with the private sector partner organization(s) involved in your Alliance project. If there are several private sector partner organizations, you must consider the risks associated with each of them.

If private sector member organizations are not directly participating in the project, a Risk Assessment form is not required since producer groups are considered not-for-profit organizations. However, if private sector member organizations directly participate in the project—whether included or not as formal partner organizations in the Alliance application alongside the producer group—you must complete the Risk Assessment form to assess the risks associated with each of these organizations.

When filling out the form, you must consider each of the association’s private sector member organizations participating in the project (when applicable) and/or those that will exploit the research results. If the research results are to be exploited by all members and you consider the membership to be too large for an organization-based assessment, you must contact NSERC’s Alliance staff before proceeding.

Funds from foreign international industrial associations may be recognized for cost sharing within an Alliance project, but only if the funds from the association are attributed to the Canada-based private sector member organization(s) participating in the project. Please contact NSERC’s Alliance staff for guidance before proceeding with the application to ensure that the association can be recognized for cost sharing.

Associations that include members located in a country listed on the Area control list of the Export and brokering controls handbook are not recognized for cost sharing.

When filling out the Risk Assessment form, you must consider each of the association’s private sector member organizations participating in the project as well as those that will exploit the research results. If the intent is to disseminate the research results to all the association’s member companies, you must assess the overall risks associated with the transfer of results to the association’s broader membership. You are not asked to undertake the assessment for each member organization.

Yes. Your application must include a training component principally intended for undergraduate, graduate and/or postdoctoral trainees. Trainees cannot consist exclusively of research professionals. As part of the application’s merit assessment, reviewers will evaluate the project’s opportunities for enriched learning experiences for undergraduate, graduate or postdoctoral trainees to develop research and professional skills.

Yes. The salary of research professionals contributing to the project is an eligible expense. You must justify the need for research professionals and clearly detail their roles and responsibilities in your proposal.

You and your co-applicant(s) must each complete a Personal data form with CCV attachment (Form 100A). This form provides information that complements that in the CCV, such as a discussion of up to five of the most significant contributions to research over the last six years. It is the same supplemental information collected for NSERC Discovery Grant applications.

No. You do not need to have a Discovery Grant to apply for an Alliance grant. However, you must hold a university faculty position that meets NSERC’s eligibility criteria.

No. Alliance grants cannot support chair salaries, but can fund related research activities. Chairs cannot include “NSERC” or “IRC” in their name.

No. Alliance grants cannot be used for the salary support of a research chair. Any contribution from partner organizations toward the chairholder’s salary will not be considered by NSERC in its cost-sharing calculation. Alliance grants can, however, support research activities that are part of an established institutional research chair.

Note that an institutional research chair cannot include “NSERC” in its name, even if the chair's research activities are supported through Alliance and/or other NSERC grants. Similarly, it cannot include “Industrial Research Chair” or “IRC” in its name since these are associated with NSERC’s long-standing Industrial Research Chairs (IRC) program, which has been discontinued.

No. Any Alliance application title must specifically describe the subject of the proposed research activities.

Partner contributions

Yes. All partners, except those whose mission is to fund R&D, must make in-kind contributions that are described in the proposal. Their value is not included in NSERC’s cost-sharing calculations.

Yes, if the funds come directly from the partner organization and support project costs during its duration. Include a cover letter from an authorized university representative describing the source of funds.

Communicating NSERC’s decisions

NSERC communicates decisions through your applicant library on the secure Alliance extranet. You will receive login details after assessment. Post-award decisions are also shared there. It is your responsibility to share decisions with partners and co-applicants.

Post-award

Grants receive an automatic one-year, no-cost extension after the funded period. For additional extensions due to extenuating circumstances, submit a grant amendment form. These do not include extra funding.

Apply now

Apply now

Contact

Email: alliance@nserc-crsng.gc.ca
Toll free: 1-855-275-2861

Results Funding decisions
Year Researcher Project Title Institution Partner(s) Area(s) of Application Funding Amount Type of Call
2021 Wheeler, Aaron Automated processing of sexual assault samples to enable rapid DNA analysis University of Toronto ANDE, Ministry of the Solicitor General Health, education and social services $450,000 Society
2021 Jamieson, Rob Development of subsurface wastewater treatment systems for municipal wastewater management in northern Canada Dalhousie University Government of Northwest Territories, Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board Water; Environment $292,409 Society
2021 Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza Predicting clinical outcomes for patients admitted to intensive care unit: developing and validating a Canadian data based ICU prognostic and planning system Dalhousie University Doctors Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia Health Authority, NS Department of Health and Wellness Information systems and technology; Medical equipment and apparatus $299,380 Society
2021 Levison, Jana Understanding groundwater, agronomy and drainage system design influences on tile water quantity and quality University of Guelph Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority, Huron County, Huron County Soil and Crop Improvement Association, Land Improvement Contractors of Ontario, ON Min of Agr & Food & Rural Affairs, University of Guelph, University of Waterloo Water; Farming: soil and water resources $243,700 Society
2021 Costa, Maycira Spatial-temporal resilience of kelp forests in the face of changing conditions in British Columbia, Canada (BCKelpR) University of Victoria Council of the Haida Nation, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Islands Trust, Marine Plan Partnership, Min Forests, Lands & Nat Res Operations & Rural Dev, Pacific Salmon Foundation, Parks Canada Agency, Tula Foundation Environment; Oceans, seas and estuaries $499,620 Society
2021 Santyr, Giles Development of tracer gas lung MRI approaches using inert fluorinated gases University of Toronto Siemens Healthcare Limited Human health (including medically-related psychological research); Medical equipment and apparatus $178,600 Society
2021 Zhang, Wenming Monitoring and modelling water quality under ice affected conditions in rivers University of Alberta Alberta Environment and Parks, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Athabasca Watershed Council, EPCOR Water Services Inc., North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance Environment; Inland waters $984,900 Society
2021 Wagner, Helene Implementing landscape connectivity assessment for biodiversity management and land-use planning in Alberta University of Toronto Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute Conservation and preservation; Construction, urban and rural planning $341,800 Society
2021 Clausi, David Automated detection of whales in aerial imagery University of Waterloo Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Whale Seeker, Inc. Engineering; Wildlife management $180,000 Society
2021 Molina Hutt, Carlos Quantifying the Seismic Resilience of the Transportation Network in the Lower Mainland, BC The University of British Columbia City of Richmond, City of Vancouver, Geological Survey of Canada, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, North Shore Emergency Management, TransLink Structural engineering $180,000 Society
2021 Zemp, Roger Deep learning for digital and virtual histology University of Alberta AltaML Inc., DynaLIFE Dx Human health (including medically-related psychological research); Biomedical engineering $360,000 Society
2021 Macvicar, Bruce Buildings and floods: Micro-scale flood risk assessment in cities University of Waterloo Credit Valley Conservation, Natural Resources Canada, Statistics Canada, TO and Region Conservation Authority Surveying and photogrammetry; Land development $1,095,150 Society
2021 Organ, Michael The COVID-19 post-apocalyptic laboratory University of Ottawa Toronto Research Chemicals Inc., Workplace Safety & Prevention Services Physical sciences; Engineering $1,350,000 Society
2021 Vanderwel, Mark Evaluating variation in the sensitivity of tree growth, mortality, and biomass allocation to climate-induced moisture stress across the western boreal forest University of Regina Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Ministry of Environment, Northern Forestry Centre Forestry (silviculture, forest management) $518,500 Society
2021 Taghipour, Fariborz Development and Evaluation of Photo-Activated Sensors for Monitoring Soil Nutrients The University of British Columbia Smart-Agrobotic Technologies Inc., Terra Optima Labs Inc., The University of British Columbia Agriculture; Electrical and electronic machinery and equipment (including computer hardware) $495,000 Society
2021 Brar, Satinder Kaur Microplastics in Sewage Sludge Exploration and Detection (MISSED) York University Environment and Climate Change Canada, Metro Vancouver, National Research Council Canada, Pollution Probe, Ripley's Aquarium of Canada, York Region Water; Environment $1,134,000 Society
2021 Andrysek, Jan Automating the design of digitally made prostheses University of Toronto Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation, Nia Technologies Medical and health sciences; Computer software $644,158 Society
2021 Tomlinson, Douglas Novel biochar-infused concrete for carbon sequestration and concrete improvement University of Alberta Innovative Reduction Strategies Inc. Structural engineering; Agriculture $111,402 Society
2021 Hopkins, Scott Detecting and treating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Canadian water systems University of Waterloo Brown and Caldwell, USP Technologies Environment; Water $1,350,000 Society
2021 Bostock, Michael Earthquake Hazards on Canada's Pacific Coast The University of British Columbia Natural Resources Canada Earth sciences; Land, solid earth, seabeds and ocean floors $1,385,000 Society
2021 Wood, Christopher The Impact of Road Salt on Pacific Salmon Success The University of British Columbia Alouette River Management Society, Burrard Inlet Marine Enhancement Society, Cariboo Heights Forest Preservation Society, Eagle Creek Streamkeepers Society, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Hoy - Scott Watershed Society, Hyde Creek Watershed Society, Seymour Salmonid Society, Silver Creek Streamkeepers, Still Moon Arts Society, Stoney Creek Environment Committee, Water Wealth Project, West Vancouver Streamkeeper Society, Yorkson Watershed Enhancement Society Conservation and preservation; Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture) $556,505 Society
2021 Wagner, Viktoria Spread and impacts of non-native Caragana arborescens, an emergent invasive shrub in the prairie region University of Alberta Alberta Environment and Parks, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Alberta Invasive Species Council, Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan Invasive Species Council Environment; Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture) $182,063 Society
2021 Basu, Nandita From data to knowledge: Designing user-driven nutrient loading observatories across the Great Lakes Basin University of Waterloo Credit Valley Conservation, DataStream Initiative, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Min of the Env, Conservation and Parks Environment; Water $352,000 Society
2022 Frigaard, Ian Well Integrity Canada 2030 The University of British Columbia Geonomic Technologies, Sanjel Energy Services Inc. Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture); Construction methods $992,000 Society
2022 Touchie, Marianne Unlocking the potential: Driving holistic performance improvements in multi-unit residential buildings University of Toronto BC Housing, National Research Council Canada, TAF, Toronto Community Housing Corporation Energy efficiency $731,800 Society
2022 Cojocaru, Monica Gabriela Modelling human behaviour response to public policy and its impact on infectious disease spread - case studies using AI/ML, data science, game theory and optimization University of Guelph Sanofi, Sanofi Pasteur Limited, Spectus Mathematical sciences; Human health (including medically-related psychological research) $200,000 Society
2022 Yarusevych, Serhiy Analysis of production and spread of aerosolized pathogens: toward quantitative distancing, occupancy, and ventilation guidelines for work and public places University of Waterloo Workplace Safety & Prevention Services Manufacturing processes and products; Human health (including medically-related psychological research) $292,000 Society
2022 Iverson, Sara Understanding habitat connectivity and population structure central to the conservation of culturally and commercially valued species in Pekwitapa'qek and Pitu'pa'q Dalhousie University Acadia University, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ocean Tracking Network, The Confederacy of Mainland Mi'kmaq, UNAMA'KI INSTITUTE OF NATURAL RESOURCES Oceans, seas and estuaries; Conservation and preservation $1,449,902 Society
2022 Huot, Yannick Validating drone sampling for monitoring freshwater ecosystems Université de Sherbrooke Spiri Robotics LLC Environment $83,600 Society
2022 Jamieson, Rob Understanding toxic benthic cyanobacteria prevalence and risk factors in Nova Scotia surface waters Dalhousie University Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia Environment, Parks Canada Agency Water; Environment $493,800 Society
2022 Mohseni, Madjid Occurrence of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their removal using novel regenerable ion exchange resins The University of British Columbia BI Pure Water (Canada) Inc., Health Canada, Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd, Magnor Inc., Orange County Water District, Sanexen Services Environnementaux Inc., Valley Water Water; Environment $893,000 Society
2022 Van Cappellen, Philippe CLAWAVE - Chemical load assessments for watersheds: automation and visualization experience University of Waterloo DataStream Initiative, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Lake Winnipeg Foundation Inland waters; Earth sciences $937,040 Society
2022 Lewis, Delano Investigating ecological interactions between insects, pesticides, and insectivorous birds breeding in Central Alberta Burman University Conservation and preservation; Wildlife management $567,899 Society
2022 Basu, Niladri Indigenization of new approach methods for contaminated sites assessments in Indigenous communities: A community-based case study in the Kanien'kéha:ka community of Kanesatake McGill University Environment; Pollutants and toxic agents (waste, use 902) $1,248,000 Society
2022 Lessard, Benoit Harm reduction through low cost point-of-source sensors University of Ottawa Medical equipment and apparatus; Health, education and social services $855,000 Society
2022 Lougheed, Stephen New genomics and aerial drone tools for monitoring, managing, and mitigating threats in aquatic ecosystems Queen's University Environment; Inland waters $844,714 Society
2022 Smith, William Discovery of Improved CO2 Capture Solvents by a Combination of Predictive Molecular-Based Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms University of Guelph Energy resources (including production, exploration, processing, distribution and use); Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture) $1,468,766 Society
2022 Leslie, Sabrina Quantitative single-molecule imaging of RNA-Lipid Nanoparticle complexes to understand and advance vaccine and gene therapy formulations The University of British Columbia Life sciences (including biotechnology); Human pharmaceuticals $306,000 Society
2022 Madden, John FLEXOVENT : An active metastructure to support artificial ventilation The University of British Columbia Medical equipment and apparatus; Human health (including medically-related psychological research) $298,350 Society
2022 Braidy, Nadi Development of a Raman probe for allergen detection Université de Sherbrooke Processed food products and beverages; Health, education and social services $1,500,000 Society
2022 Hudson, Zachary Smartphone-Based Molecular Diagnostics for Rural and Remote Health Care Settings The University of British Columbia Human health (including medically-related psychological research); Information systems and technology $1,476,019 Society
2023 Zimmerman, Naomi Assessing and communicating air quality in community clean air spaces: influence of season and building characteristics The University of British Columbia Climate and atmosphere; Engineering $310,000 Society
2023 Chau, Kenneth UV LED Water Disinfection Technologies for Small Drinking Water Systems The University of British Columbia Water; Instrumentation technology $572,500 Society
2023 Wood, Lisa The effects of glyphosate-based herbicide on gut bacteria in a forest food web University of Northern British Columbia Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture); Forestry (silviculture, forest management) $1,339,903 Society
2023 Duquette, Jean Development of a solar-driven adsorption thermal energy storage system concept for space heating applications in northern remote indigenous communities Carleton University Energy storage and conversion; Materials performance $1,108,752 Society
2023 Rooney, Rebecca Restoring Urban Meadow: The Meadoway University of Waterloo Conservation and preservation; Environment $772,235 Society
2023 Venkiteswaran, Jason REMEdiation: Whole lake manipulations to develop REdox and trace MEtal mitigation options for harmful algal blooms Wilfrid Laurier University Water; Environment $890,350 Society
2023 Berezovski, Maxim Development of New Quantum and Magnetic Materials for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery and Magnetodynamic Therapy University of Ottawa Life sciences (including biotechnology); Physical sciences $1,338,250 Society
2023 Woodside, Michael Developing single-molecule mass photometry as a tool for discovering and characterising protein aggregation inhibitors University of Alberta Human pharmaceuticals; Life sciences (including biotechnology) $510,000 Society
2023 Tremblay, Rejean Impact acoustique du trafic maritime sur des espèces modèles benthiques d'intérêt commercial Université du Québec à Rimouski Commercial fisheries; Oceans, seas and estuaries $602,000 Society
2023 Scott, John Innovative carbon capture for Canada's SME breweries and wineries to convert wastes into natural health and environment beneficial products Laurentian University Processed food products and beverages; Waste, waste management and recycling $492,464 Society
2023 Popp, Jesse Weaving Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science for More Effective and Collaborative Moose Monitoring and Research University of Guelph Environment; Wildlife management $1,460,170 Society
2023 Cornelis, Jean-Thomas RISE - Revitalizing Indigenous Forest Garden Stewardship to Enhance Soil Capacity to Sustain Resiliency of Food-Forest Ecosystems The University of British Columbia Forestry (silviculture, forest management); Environment $757,180 Society
2023 Stix, John Imaging, forecasting, and mitigating natural hazards McGill University Earth sciences; Surveying and photogrammetry $916,186 Society
2023 Poulin, Monique Zéro perte nette de milieux humides : en route vers des approches de restauration éclairées Université Laval Land development; Conservation and preservation $3,827,573 Society
2023 Ecoffey, Serge Integration of a Bio-sourced epoxy for the reduction of BPA and petro-chemical agents in the microelectronics packaging eco-system Université de Sherbrooke Information, computer and communication technologies $2,170,150 Society
2023 Hendry, Andrew Discovering and Protecting Unique Freshwater Diversity in Eastern Canada, With Special Focus on Threespine Stickleback Fish in Quebec Parks McGill University Environment $298,490 Society
2023 Zheng, Rong Non-Contact mmWave-based Health Monitoring Systems for Memory Care McMaster University Information, computer and communication technologies; Human health (including medically-related psychological research) $665,814 Society
2023 Mclagan, David Black Kite - a UAV, sensor-based wildfire smoke monitoring system: System assessment and application to Indigenous Fire Stewardship and wildfire smoke science Queen's University Environment; Forestry (silviculture, forest management) $1,173,250 Society
2023 Quideau, Sylvie Carbon under Canadian forests - Why soils matter University of Alberta Environment; Forestry (silviculture, forest management) $1,493,400 Society
2023 Forbes, Shari A Pan-Canadian Study of Forensically Relevant Scavenger Guilds to Improve Police Search Protocols for Human Remains University of Windsor Advancement of knowledge $232,051 Society
2023 Derry, Alison The Ecological Consequences of Iron Ore Mining on Northern Aquatic Biodiversity Revealed by Environmental DNA Université du Québec à Montréal Inland waters; Environment $148,500 Society
2023 Morissette, Olivier Multidisciplinary approach to study population structure of the Lake St. Francis Yellow Perch; a pivotal shared-jurisdiction fishery resource Université du Québec à Chicoutimi Wildlife management; Commercial fisheries $185,500 Society
2023 Gerolin, Augusto Quantum Information, Chemistry, Materials and Machine learning for Intermediate-scale Quantum Computing University of Ottawa Materials sciences; Computer software $4,989,400 Society
2024 Guilherme, Stéphanie Wastewater-based health monitoring in northern communities in Nunavik Université Laval Human health (including medically-related psychological research); Waste, waste management and recycling $1,200,000 Society
2024 Blanchet, Pierre Le bâtiment comme outil de réduction des émissions de GES Université Laval Environment; Advancement of knowledge $2,358,764 Society
2024 Wasmuth, James Advancing the genome-to-drug pipeline for the discovery of urgently needed new anthelmintics for livestock University of Calgary Veterinary pharmaceuticals; Animal management (animal diseases, breeding) $1,293,000 Society
2024 Boulanger-Lapointe, Noémie Alpine Horizons: Integrative Solutions for Sustainable Management in Changing Climates and Recreation Landscapes of the BC southwest Coast Mountains University of Victoria Environment; Modelling and mathematical simulation of natural processes $2,516,901 Society
2024 Hu, Baoxin An AI-driven approach that incorporates Two-Eyed Seeing to the accurate quantification of forest vegetation and integrity for nature-based climate solutions York University Environment; Forestry (silviculture, forest management) $1,022,281 Society
2024 Cauchy, Pierre Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for the monitoring of endangered baleen whales in the St Lawrence estuary Université du Québec à Rimouski Oceans, seas and estuaries; Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture) $456,481 Society
2024 Soares, Joao SWIFT: An Intelligent Coagulation-Flocculation System for the Remediation of Mineral and Oil Sand Tailings University of Alberta Water; Environment $1,498,692 Society
2024 Nancekivell, Shaylene Towards a Holistic Model of Child-AI Interactions University of Manitoba Psychology; Information systems and technology $901,243 Society
2025 Koppes, Michele Community-centred approaches to cascading hazards in glaciated mountains The University of British Columbia Environment; Advancement of knowledge $1,923,080 Society
2025 Chiasson, Sonia EDIT-STEM: A technological platform for advancing equity, diversity, and inclusion in the natural sciences and engineering Carleton University Computer software; Advancement of knowledge $1,671,832 Society